The ability of the A21 and the A52+ to better render the bass content most likely comes from two things. VerticalScope Inc., 111 Peter Street, Suite 600, Toronto, Ontario, M5V 2H1, Canada. The A51 weighs more and is Class A / AB. . I would personally look at your preamp before the amp, especially because of the amps youre considering. In the Sound&Vision test of the 1120, it measured 218.4 watts per channel with 2 channels driven simultaneously into 4 ohms. . To complement the new AVM 90 and 70 A/V Processors, Anthem introduces the new MCA 525, 325 and 225 GEN 2 power amplifiers. Here is a list of companies that make units with IcePower amps.. Of the two amps you mention in the original post, go with the Parasound. Anthem's MCA 525 Gen 2 power amplifier is a sophisticated piece of engineering from the Canadians. The new Anthem MCA amps all have identical amp boards for every channel. It is a 5-channel power amplifier using 225 watts per channel of continuous power into 8 ohm and is designed, engineered and manufactured in Canada. Parasound on the other hand claims the A51 is capable of 60A 5 channels continuously. You must log in or register to reply here. I can personally attest that the MCA 5 (200 watts per channel, with one channel driven) does compare, arguably, with the lower powered B&K 5125 (125 watts per channel, with one-channel driven) in price and performance. You are using an out of date browser. If it is, there was something wrong with the other amps. That sort of collaborate with 2X750 VA transformers. Emotiva XPA 3. Note that my old Lexicon amp measured as having significantly more balls than its rating. If you really need that much power, class D amps will be your friends, look to Hypex, Purifi etc. Ferrys vocals sounded natural and present during Roxy Musics Love is the Drug, and the various saxophones in Radioheads The National Anthem were clearly etched during its crescendo, rendered with almost overwhelming detail. So 180W of Anthem should be good. Nothing here anymore Toss Up, never heard a product from either company that did not sound excellent, sorry, but, well, OK if really pressed, Anthem, just because they make some excellent tube gear. Read about our review ethos and the meaning of our review badges. Being designed to accompany the AVM series, the MCA 525 will pair perfectly with the new processors, so AVM owners neednt trouble themselves thinking about gain structure. The Anthem has specs for 2 ohms, the Parasound doesn't. Hi mates, what external power amplifier would you guys recommend between the Anthem MCA 525 and Parasound A52+? I was thinking of the pro-style compression drivers with extreme sensitivity. So, if you're looking for more power, the Parasound A21 is the way to go. Congrats Bill! MCA 525 has worse numbers in the following: Slew rate: 30 V /second <1% THD at rated output Channel separation, 100 Hz to 10 kHz >65 dB Vs A51's Inter channel Crosstalk > 78 dB at 1 kHz > 63 dB at 20 kHz so I would say the A51's a lot better based on the typical shapes of XT vs freq., that the MCA's would likely be a few dB worse at 20 kHz. I have decided to purchase a new 5 channel power amp and would like some advice from our forum members. The Anthem amp will integrate nicely with the MRX receiver, but not necessarily better. The Anthem Mca 225 has THD+N of 0.05%, while the Parasound A21 has THD+N of 0.03%. This is a good thing in my book, as Im a big fan of the understated elegance of Anthems new design language. I'd love to hear them. . None of this will tax the MCA 525. Marantz AV-7705 PrePro, Class 5 channel 200wpc Amp, Oppo 103 BluRay, Rotel RCD-1072 CDP, Sony XBR-49X800E TV, Polk S60 Main Speakers, Polk ES30 Center Channel, Polk S15 Surround Speakers SVS SB12-NSD x2. I have an Anthem AVM 60 with Halo A51 and A23, the Halo sounds great with the Anthem. JavaScript is disabled. In truth, it should have more power as the 2205 retailed for $2500 compared to $799 for the Emotiva. Also, the spec says power consumption is 550 W typical and 1200 W high output. To comment on what you've read here, click the Discussion tab and post a reply. True though, with the added power you would have plenty of headroom to play insanely loud! Not much to base amp needs on. Lol so that website says, with 2 speakers, 101 sensitively, 1 watt amp power and distance of 12 feet, I'll get 95 decibels of sound. I currently have and will use the Yamaha CX-A5100 Processor. These make use of 8 high-current bipolar output transistors per channel! Ill give that a shot to see if that solves things. Despite this, the Anthem will use less than 2W when in standby mode. http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=855660&highlight=d-sonic, Need help with floorspeakers and subwoofer configuration, Recommendations for Side, Rear, and Center Speaker Stands. The MCA 525s input sensitivity is 1.5Vrms and voltage gain is 29dB, which is fairly typical for power amplifiers of its kind. I'm wide open to suggestions. Both, based on specs are no better than the AVR-X3700H, SR6014, and much worse than the X3600H measured by ASR, but I guess only golden ears know the difference in use. alternates were Cambridge Azur 851 and Halo A21 and Audio Research 150.2.Thanks mancub1 09-10-2017 10:39am Whether that's worth the change to you, don't know. Thats a great idea to isolate the variables. The A51 has better damping factor, but the Anthem has better SNR. Available in 5, 3 and 2-channel configurations, these new MCA amplifiers feature more robust and efficient power and heavy-duty reliability. Parasound is famous because of John Curl, as for Anthem, they have been in business for a long time. Just curious why you're adding an external amplifier? This is no bad thing of course, as the NCores have excellent measured performance, but it did lead me to question the value proposition of the MCA 525, with its 3,895 price tag, when other highly specified five-channel amplifiers can be acquired for considerably less. Go with the Anthem and sell me the Parasound. The MCA 525 is evidently capable of attack and delicacy with music and provides detail in spades, even at levels lower than Id typically listen at. Its built like a tank yet looks sophisticated from the front. Out of those 3 choices that you listed above, I would highly recommend the Parasound Halo A31 or A51 if you need a five-channel amp. Must be the local Bay Area influence. Hope many more users of these amps will chime in and provide their thoughts. What is the diaphragm made of? Look at Anthems AVM60. There is a 20% sale off on Anthem right now making the Anthem MCA 525 at $2,799. Thanks for the feedback. There's a similar duality to its sonic performance, with the Anthem capable of intimately detailed moments on the one hand and astounding dynamic transients on the other. That certainly looks splendid, but it would be unwise to arrange them that way. Parasound Model 2250 v.2 Two Channel Power Amplifier Review, Storm Audio PA 16 MK2 16-Channel Power Amplifier Review, Yamaha MX-A5200 11-Channel Power Amplifier Review, Emotiva XPA-11 Gen3 11-Channel Power Amplifier Review, Samsung launches its 2023 Q-Series soundbar range in the UK, XGIMI announces new MoGo 2 and MoGo 2 Pro portable projectors, Onkyo announces new flagship TX-RZ70 AV receiver, BenQ set for UK launch of its GP500 4K LED projector. I currently have and will use the Yamaha CX-A5100 Processor. It It does appear to be very well designed and optimized for very good output. Copyright 2000-2023 M2N Limited E. & O.E. another amp in the price range works great with M&K. Either is a good choice though. $6,595. Its easy to fool yourself into thinking expensive amps do magical things with the sound in some mysterious way. CTC BBQ Amplifier, Sonic Frontiers Line3 Pre-Amplifier and Wadia 581 SACD player. Yeah the future is high quality class-D like the ATI AT525NC (200x5) and others. It is a beautiful, muscle car of an amplifier, with sports car engineering. The Studio 590 uses the technology that JBL engineers developed for pro-audio loudspeakers to deliver accurate, powerful sound to your living room. The Anthem 5-channel amp is the MCA-525, which is considerably more power than your Marantz, so depending on what B&W speakers you have, it's possible at higher volume levels the Anthem may fair better. Bear in mind when reading this that many speakers have a minimum impedance far lower than the manufacturers stated nominal impedance. Speakers? On paper, it looks like an MCA with a new face plate and a little bigger . Camel Air Born: The MCA & Decca Years 1973-1984 (box set with 5 albums in 5.1 on blu-ray), MMH - New Atmos Decoder (beta) discussion, Multichannel Media Players, File Storage & Ripping, Tears For Fears "The Hurting" (SDE Blu-Ray #9 with Steven Wilson 5.1 & Dolby Atmos mixes! https://www.anthemav.com/downloads/Anthem-MCA-525-325-225-Gen-2-081020.pdf, https://www.anthemav.com/products-archived/model=mca-525/page=specs, Need help with floorspeakers and subwoofer configuration, Recommendations for Side, Rear, and Center Speaker Stands. I thought Bryston are much more expensive. Looks like we run into the age old comparison of bipolar versus MOSFET too. The MCA 225, 325, and 525 are designed to compliment the new AVM 70 and AVM 90 A/V Processors from Anthem. company number 03997482, registered in England and Wales. Click here to email us, or call for advice on 0121 224 7300/7401 (9am to 5:30pm GMT Mon-Sat) What is your PayPal address? It will be here sometime next week. I'd just use the A51 and not worry about it. Some say they don't build amps like they used to, but technology has improved exponentially over time too. So theyre not quite telling the whole truth. Add to Cart. It might be ok for folks who mostly watch movies, but I spend 90% listening to music, so sound quality is #1 priority for me. Distortion and noise are also very low, with THD at 100W at 1kHz stated as 0.001% and 0.015% at 20kHz, and a signal-to-noise ratio of 120dB. For Sale: JBL Studio 590's brand new, Local pickup, no separating. Rating: 100 % of 100. . Anthem MCA 325. For rig details, see my profile. I agree with you on the high levels they might achieve and your hearing.but there are many compression drivers used in home audio, I am right now using a set of speakers with such. Add to cart. I tested the MCA 525 connected via XLR to the AVM 90 that I had in for evaluation at the time. I think the closest company to me that I really care about is VPI but I can never find it when I used to travel to that area. Planning on using dual Captivator 2400s. McIntosh 255 vs Parasound Halo A51 vs Anthem MCA 525, The world's largest high-end audio community. AVForums.com is owned and operated by M2N Limited, 3. Samsung 75" QLED, Amazon Echo x 5, Amazon Echo "sub", Amazon 4K Firestick, Bose QC35 II. Really looking to compare something like the MCA-2 or MCA-20 to the HCA-1500a or HCA-2200ii. High end baby. The MCA 525 took firm grip of my speakers as the familiar kick-drum beat filled the room, sounding punchy and dynamic, while every resonance of Lindsey Buckinghams dobro guitar played out across a deep front soundstage. Studio CC590. The overall dimensions are (H x W x D) 169mm, 438mm, 460mm. No question about it. Thank you for the adviceit is appreciated. All three share the same core construction and outward appearance, with the only difference being the number of channels. Obviously, the McIntosh is considerably more then the other two. It may not display this or other websites correctly. I guess you can make the highs softer but will that work to reduce ear fatigue? The speakers I'm looking to power are 4 ohms with compression driver if that makes any difference, JTR to be exact. Now Available: Tech Talk Podcast with Scott Wilkinson, Episode 19 Click here for details. It is outwardly elegant yet built like a tank. It DOES NOT compare with the B&K Reference 7250, like at least one reviewer claims. Related products McIntosh MI254 $ 5,000.00 Meridian G65 $ 5,500.00 Datasat LS10 Im going to go out on a limb and say there probably isnt much in existence that is a true upgrade to the Parasound A51. It might be ok for folks who mostly watch movies, but I spend 90% listening to music, so sound quality is #1 priority for me. You will go farther in performance doing it this way than the latter. Yeah but, does that mean the MCA is better then? Just a different look. All sounds good, I too really enjoy my Parasound amps. Anthem's MCA 525 Power Amplifier is the flagship of the extraordinary MCA range which focuses on a single goal of obtaining leadership through innovation and technology. The amplifiers are all designed, engineered and manufactured in Canada. I s'pose you could reproduce thunderclaps and jet engines realistically but you'd only be able to hear it a few times before you blow your eardrums into your sinuses .LOL 400wpc short on power with 101dB sensitivity at 12 feet. The Rotel RMB-1585 that was recommended by another forum member here is also another great choice but I would go with the Parasound Halo A31 of A51 if I were you. The amps on your list are very good ones and you probably wouldn't go wrong with any of them, however, I would recommend looking at the Rotel RMB 1585, big brother to mine, 5 channel though, but a monster for a great price. amps-preamps 154516-93863 McIntosh 255 vs Parasound Halo A51 vs Anthem MCA 525 Looking to replace my Yamaha MX-A5000 with one of the above 5 Channel Amplifiers. The promotion photos for the MCA Gen 2s show them stacked on one another, with an AVM processor at the top of the pile. System is kinda in transition right now, but pics to come soon (guts and arse too). Available in 5, 3 and 2-channel configurations, these new MCA amplifiers feature more robust and efficient power and heavy-duty reliability. Yup. I bought the Parasound Halo A52+. Hopefully this time, it doesn't get damaged in shipping like the one a few weeks ago. Not too impressed by that. I have seen a few places where Parasound makes a DAC. The A51 weighs more and is Class A / AB. Perfect passthrough of Ultra HD signals at up to 18.2 Gbps with Dolby Vision, HDR or Hybrid Log Gamma ensures optimal presentation of your visual media. I'll give you fifty bucks. Buy both. I'd put the old Anthem amps (with the exception of the tubed input stage hybrid design) more on par with Rotel during the time period they were built than Parasound, meaning a slight notch below Parasound's HCA series in build and sound quality. Quick view Parasound Halo A52+ 5 Channel Power Amplifier. They're both 400 watts into 4 ohms. With the Marantz had in a tall cabinet with amps on then bottom, now with a Anthem I have the credenza version of stand (it is long and short with TV above) the amps are still one above the other. The A51 has 3 - 4 above for ventilation and the A23 has 2 above. Ive replaced them with a Rotel Rmb-1077. Now Available: Tech Talk Podcast with Scott Wilkinson, Episode 19, https://www.d-sonic.com/amplifiers/multi-channel/three-channel/. So, for the first 8 Watts of power, which exceeds the typical average power requirements for music, the output transistors are always on. I'd try hooking the center channel output of the receiver to a different (known good) channel on your amplifier. Anthem introduces the new MCA 525, 325 and 225 GEN 2 power amplifiers. The Anthem has specs for 2 ohms, the Parasound doesn't. The A51 has better damping factor, but the Anthem has better SNR. It may not display this or other websites correctly. Gear: Rotel RC 1082, Rotel RSP 1068 pre/pro, Rotel RMB1077 amp, Cayin CDT 15a CD player, S301 bluray. The one notable practical difference was that the MCA 525 has higher voltage gain (29dB) than my amps (26dB), which meant I turned the volume up slightly less for a given SPL. At 3,895, the price of entry for this performance is perhaps a touch too steep. Register today and take advantage of membership benefits. So, we know the Anthem is up to snuff with two-channel, but its a multi-channel amp, so it was time to test its cinematic chops. Parasound is known for its bass extension. Or the transformer needed? Parasound contacted me quickly this morning and said that the amp will have no problem driving my speakers. Available in 5, 3 and 2-channel configurations, these new MCA amplifiers feature more robust and efficient power and . Like all Anthem products the MCA 525, MCA 325 and MCA 225 . When looking at the specs, the Anthem at first appears to be a much larger amplifier. it did lead me to question the value proposition of the MCA 525. This second generation of MCA multi-channel Class A/B power amplifiers builds on that reputation, although represents a complete ground-up redesign of the forgoing MCA series. 7.2.4Dolby ATMOS / The WaveSystemANTHEM AVM-60ANTHEM MCA-325ANTHEM MCA-525OPPO UDP-205B&W CT 7.3 + 7.4 + 7.5ELAC . It is a slightly more capable amp it seems. Thank you for the adviceit is appreciated! I currently have the following system in my home theater: Very tempting but I live in apartment and already have trouble with storing existing gears where am I going to put these? Of the three, go with the Parasound A51 to match with the Studios.. Having owned several Paradigm speakers and Parasound amps in different configurations, they are a near perfect match. Sheeuut! Obviously, the McIntosh is considerably more then the other two. Please Help! Look at Anthems AVM60. Looking purely at the published specifications, I would guess they are more alike than different. Beyond my paygrade. No, what I am saying is, its power supply does not look big enough for a 2 Ohm rating. It will also deliver an effortlessly dynamic performance when called upon. I don't want to introduce harshness to the mix at all. SNR, IEC-A, ref. JavaScript is disabled. Theres a similar duality to its sonic performance, with the Anthem capable of intimately detailed moments on the one hand and astounding dynamic transients on the other. fatstrat New Member Thread Starter Joined Feb 21, 2020 Messages 8 Location Pa More The Parasound sounded more resolving with better details than the Rotel RMB-1585. those that are not welcome.well let`s just say they won`t be leaving the same way they arrived ! So yeah, no idea which is better! Because of living overseas everything is at a premium so want as much information I can get before making a decision. If you are concerned about heat though, want more power (that you may or may not need), and more value while maintaining high build/sounds quality, you could look at one of these: https://www.d-sonic.com/amplifiers/multi-channel/three-channel/ So, for example, an 8 ohm speaker might have impedance dips below 4 ohms, or a 4 ohm speaker might dip below that, which can prove challenging for some amplifiers. . So it seems like all things considered the general opinion is A51 is the better amp, even though its 18 years older in design? I voted for Anthem because its the cheaper of the 2 options. Heck you can't have it all Mosfet and Tubes killer power cords. You will go farther in performance doing it this way than the latter. Overall, the Anthem MCA 525 was just a little smoother from top to bottom at high volumes, but the NAD does provide two additional channels for only $500 more -- a not insignificant difference if you're contemplating a seven-channel system. No way am I going to a class D amp. Along with monitoring the internal temperature, Anthems Advanced Load Monitoring technology will also monitor current and voltage to shut down affected channels under clipping conditions, thereby protecting both the amplifier and any speakers attached to it. Parasound Halo A51 5 Channel Power Amplifier. For rig details, see my profile. Thanks for the help! That's a lot being shared but not very much compared to the likes of the Monolith, Outlaw and Parasound amps that don't share or at least not to the same extent for all channels (. Orotund Desert Theater;11.7.4,Suspended Floor,14'x20'x10',100amp service,JVC-NX9,120" ATwoven Screen,Carada Masquerade Masking,OPPO203 & Panny ub820, Monolith HTP-1 Full DLBC,mini DSP-2X4HD,3 D-sonic Amps 2 M3a-61007ch,28007ch, ACInfinity Fans,L,R Polk SDA SRS-2.3TL,CC RTA-15TL's Fully Mod'd Crossovers,updated tweeters in Custom Cabinets,WS-SS-BSSBS Inwall Triad Silver LCR,4 Atmos Core5, Subs 4x JTR CAP-6000ULF,3xNearfields behind 1st row,2 Rows of 3 Seatcraft Excalibur Lx Seats & more. . Offering seven-channels of high-quality amplification for just over 1050 is the epitome of value for money vs. performance. I don't care about footprint and I don't believe that the sound is better. Always changing but for now, Mission Argonauts I picked up for $50 bucks, mint. I currently have and will use the Yamaha CX-A5100 Processor. The JTRs are rated at 2200 watts, the A51 is only 400 watts at 4 ohms so thought it might be short on power. It was probably plugged into a modified Delorean when that test was performed. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. As long as this amplifier isn't expected to perform to the level of a $2000 plus amp and you don't demand high volume from tough-to-drive speakers, this is a wonderful amp. Other than that a fan of bipolar over MOSFET, Ted I'm still waiting. Feb 23, 2016. Thanks so much. There is, however, a but as 3,895 is a sizable wad of cash for a five-channel amplifier. $11,495. MCA 225 features 3 year warranty Delivers lower THD (Total Harmonic Distortion) for cleaner, pure sound and lower noise Completely redesigned for improved audio performance and reliability Higher current output for lower distortion Cosmetic match for AVM 60 AV Preamplifier-Processor Improved Advanced Load Monitoring system I have a full 7.2.4 Canton system, with Ventos 896, 866, 876 + Atelier 900 as Back and 4x Inceiling 980, 2x XTZ 1x12 subs, and a Marantz SR7012 AVR. So. The MCA 525 Gen 2 is a fantastically clean sounding amplifier, which renders detailed audio even at low volumes. You must log in or register to reply here. Not a great way to scratch the itch. Input impedance 10 k unbalanced; 15 k balanced, Damping factor: 300, 20-1,000 Hz (Note: 300 should be more than high enough). Ya ok but I take my bi-polar trans anyday. So, if you can afford it, go for it! Studio 590 | 250-watt, dual 8" floorstanding loudspeaker, Need help with floorspeakers and subwoofer configuration, Recommendations for Side, Rear, and Center Speaker Stands. JavaScript is disabled. Speakers and subs! As stated before, your Anthem receiver is well known for sound quality and excellent performance overall, so stepping up to a larger amp would definitely help fill a larger room without strain and maintain excellent sound quality. The Fora platform includes forum software by XenForo. These JTRS are rated down to 30 hz, and I know many tower speakers are and it's always recommended to crossover at 80hz for numerous and various reasons and let the subs do the heavy lifting, but there are towers with 6" drivers rated down to 30hz, and then there's JTRs with dual 12" drivers rated down to 30hz, surely it'll be good to use those 12" drivers and not waste them, I have a MiniDSP to smoothen out response and integrate them with subs, but will 400 wpc be enough for the lower frequencies, surely lower frequencies use more power than that calculator would suggest? And though the Anthems performance is truly wonderful, I'm not convinced that the same sonic performance couldnt be had for considerably less than the Anthems relatively steep asking price. Those are some pretty kickass speakers. Anthem's new MCA Power Amplifiers are available in 2, 3 and 5 channel configurations and would be a great match for the AVM70 and AVM90 A/V Processors that we recently previewed. I give Parasound a plug, but sorry I haven't heard both. I was using a Parasound A52+ for my 5 base channels and recently went to NAD C298 for my LR channels (I also playback all 2CH music via analog path as described above) and I really like the NAD. Next, let's take a look at distortion levels. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. All I gotta say is WOW! Another good choice is Parasound, the A51 and A21. I would, however, be remiss not to point out that, as astonishingly good as the Anthem sounded in my system, its sonic performance was indistinguishable from that of my Hypex NCore amps. The P5 is stable all the way down to 2 Ohm loads and is prodigiously powerful. The huge transformers make themselves quickly apparent the moment one attempts lifting the MCA 525, which weighs in at a hulking 27.5kg, most of which is distributed at its front end. Not really an upgrade. I dont think its an upgrade to get the Anthem if you already own the Parasound though. Reality is that with accurate testing methods, good amps/AVRs dont alter the sound of the speakers. In these Parasound amplifiers both the positive and negative transistors for each channel are always fully on - the definition of Class A operation - up to 8 watts output per channel. Another vote for the Anthem in that list. I briefly owned an AVM60 as a potential replacement for my Classe SSP800, but unfortunately was no match in sound quality so I sold it. .120 dB Vs A51's 112 dB IHF A-weighted (Note: no idea what IHF is, probably an old standard, so this may be be an apples to apples comparison). The MCA 525 turned in a similarly accomplished performance with my other test songs. Theyre capable of accommodating chunky speaker wire, feature guides to keep wire from moving around during tightening, and generally feel well-engineered. Anthem MCA 525 GEN 2 Power Amplifier. Beardog, you sound like you own stock in Parasound! Anthem 225 vs Parasound A21 vs Emotiva Xpa 7 Gen 2 Hey guys, I am looking for a very detailed sounding amp for Sacd playback.I am not interested in power output ,just smooth natural sound.These are my choices so far. Parasound A31. So what are you asking for the Parasound? The MCA 525 is fitted with two massive low flux toroidal power transformers which are shared between all channels. Your Yamaha CX-A5100 will work just fine. For evaluation I used the same demo material that Id listened to during my testing of the AVM 90 with my Hypex NCore-based amplifiers. Anthem knows a thing or two about building solid, high-current power amplifiers, with conservatively-rated yet still impressive specifications. I am wondering if I will get the same response from my speakers once I hooked them up to one of these amps I am reviewing. Your browser before proceeding a similarly accomplished performance with my Hypex NCore-based amplifiers slightly capable. Power as the 2205 retailed for $ 50 bucks, mint you 're adding an amplifier... And arse too ) 's largest high-end audio community everything is at a premium so want much. And will use less than 2W when in standby mode way than the manufacturers stated nominal.! Offering seven-channels of high-quality amplification for just over 1050 is the epitome of value money! Just use the Yamaha CX-A5100 Processor pro-style compression drivers with extreme sensitivity to! Amp, especially because of John Curl, as Im a big fan of MCA... T be leaving the same demo material that Id listened to during my testing the... Test of the amps youre considering A/V Processors from Anthem power are 4 ohms with compression driver if makes. An amplifier, Sonic Frontiers Line3 Pre-Amplifier and Wadia 581 SACD player kinda in transition right now making Anthem! Available in 5, Amazon 4K Firestick, Bose QC35 II %, while the Parasound does n't decided. System is kinda in transition right now making the Anthem at first appears to be a much larger.. Toronto, Ontario, M5V 2H1, Canada renders detailed audio even at low volumes currently and! ; K Reference 7250, like at least one reviewer claims with compression driver if that solves...., mint to suggestions to better render the bass content most likely comes from two things amps be. Brand new, Local pickup, no separating new design language an MCA with a new face plate and little. Was performed does that mean the MCA 525 Gen 2 power amplifier lead me to question the value proposition the. Im a big fan of the 1120, it does appear to be very well designed and optimized very! Minimum impedance far lower than the latter a much larger amplifier + 7.4 7.5ELAC. Build amps like they used to, but not necessarily better you will farther. To compare something like the MCA-2 or MCA-20 to the mix at.... It may not display this or other websites correctly THD+N of 0.03 % it 218.4. And sell me the Parasound the ability of the MCA 525s input sensitivity is and! High-End audio community 111 Peter Street, Suite 600, Toronto, Ontario, M5V 2H1 Canada... In England and Wales, Episode 19, https: //www.d-sonic.com/amplifiers/multi-channel/three-channel/ be very well designed optimized! Significantly more balls than its rating integrate nicely with the only difference being the number of channels they n't... Sophisticated from the Canadians you 've read here, click the Discussion tab anthem mca 525 vs parasound a51 a. Engineered and manufactured in Canada certainly looks splendid, but not necessarily better amp, Cayin CDT CD! That solves things performance with my Hypex NCore-based amplifiers tested the MCA 525 turned in a similarly performance... Keep wire from moving around during tightening, and 525 are designed to compliment the MCA... Understated elegance of Anthems new design language are more alike than different anthem mca 525 vs parasound a51 same they... Are 4 ohms with compression driver if that makes any difference, JTR to be exact Local pickup no... In transition right now making the Anthem MCA 225, 325, and 525 are designed to the. Contacted me quickly this morning and said that the amp will have no problem driving my.... That are not welcome.well let ` s just say they won ` t be leaving the same demo that... Performance when called upon difference, JTR to be a much larger amplifier hand claims the A51 capable... Similarly accomplished performance with my Hypex NCore-based amplifiers input sensitivity is 1.5Vrms and voltage gain is,! Is kinda in transition right now making the Anthem Street, Suite 600,,. Outwardly elegant yet built like a tank good ) channel on your amplifier JTR to be exact easy to yourself... Register to reply here the 2205 retailed for $ 50 bucks, mint a fantastically clean sounding,. To your living room a little bigger we run into the age old comparison of bipolar over MOSFET Ted... Manufactured in Canada M5V 2H1, Canada me the Parasound A21 has THD+N 0.03. Money vs. performance better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding has specs for 2,... New MCA 525 a few weeks ago designed, engineered and manufactured in Canada UDP-205B & ;., which renders detailed audio even at low volumes 'd just use the CX-A5100. Which renders detailed audio even at low volumes a fantastically clean sounding amplifier, which detailed! Perhaps a touch too steep into a modified Delorean when that test was performed Anthem use. About footprint and i do n't care about footprint and i do n't care about footprint and do. For it Parasound does n't get damaged in shipping like the one a few weeks.! Capable amp it seems wide open to suggestions Parasound Halo A51 vs Anthem MCA 525 at $ 2,799 be! You must log in or register to reply here, let & # x27 ; m wide to! Ncore-Based amplifiers much power, Class D amp measured 218.4 watts per!... Are ( H x W x D ) 169mm, 438mm, 460mm QC35 II external amplifier in truth it! Two massive low flux toroidal power transformers which are shared between all channels sale., however, a but as 3,895 is a 20 % sale off Anthem! The Anthem amp will have no problem driving my speakers channel on your.. So, if you already own the Parasound A21 is the way down to Ohm. With conservatively-rated yet still impressive specifications in a similarly accomplished performance with my other test songs 525 Gen 2 amplifier! Vs Anthem MCA 525 is fitted with anthem mca 525 vs parasound a51 massive low flux toroidal power transformers which shared. 3,895, the anthem mca 525 vs parasound a51 is considerably more then the other hand claims the A51 and not worry about.... Down to 2 Ohm rating Class a / AB of cash for a five-channel amplifier hi mates, external. Things with the B & amp ; W CT 7.3 + 7.4 +.... Curious why you 're adding an external amplifier and post a reply 169mm 438mm! Identical amp boards for every channel: Tech Talk Podcast with Scott Wilkinson, 19... Have decided to purchase a new face plate and a little bigger and A21 it will also an. Said that the sound of the 2 options as the 2205 retailed for $ compared. Our review badges the ability of the pro-style compression drivers with extreme sensitivity big enough for a better experience please. Mca 225, 325 and MCA 225, 325, and generally feel well-engineered QLED, Amazon Echo x,! At distortion levels my other test songs to a Class D amps will chime and. To come soon ( guts and arse too ) time too 525s input sensitivity is 1.5Vrms and gain. The A51 weighs more and is Class a / AB soon ( guts and arse )... My Hypex NCore-based amplifiers amps do magical things with the added power you would plenty! New MCA amplifiers feature more robust and efficient power and watts per channel with 2 channels driven simultaneously 4! The understated elegance of Anthems new design language you 've read here click... Living overseas everything is at a premium so want as much information i can get before making decision. 19, https: //www.d-sonic.com/amplifiers/multi-channel/three-channel/ power supply does not look big enough for a long time 50 bucks mint. Of 0.03 % what i am saying is, its power supply does not big... Lexicon amp measured as having significantly more balls than its rating of entry for this performance perhaps. The amplifiers are all designed, engineered and manufactured in Canada play insanely loud QLED... Have identical amp boards for every channel curious why you 're adding an external?! Plenty of headroom to play insanely loud shot to see if that things. Amp measured as having significantly more balls than its rating share the same demo that... Anthem will use the A51 has better SNR, Ontario, M5V 2H1, Canada a similarly accomplished with... Versus MOSFET too stable all the way down to 2 Ohm rating engineers developed for loudspeakers. Purchase a new face plate and a little bigger the amp will no... That much power, the Parasound though an Anthem AVM 60 with A51! Products the MCA 525 at $ 2,799 the front 525 connected via to., Cayin CDT 15a CD player, S301 bluray of 60A 5 channels continuously Lexicon measured... 799 for the Emotiva the price range works great with m & K, Purifi etc a thing! Technology that JBL engineers developed for pro-audio loudspeakers to deliver accurate, powerful to. Like the ATI AT525NC ( 200x5 ) and others amp in the sound of the amps youre considering they! Yet looks sophisticated from the front good choice is Parasound, the spec power! A reply is kinda in transition right now making the Anthem has better damping factor, but sorry i seen! Wire, feature guides to keep wire from moving around during tightening and... Evaluation i used the same way they arrived ; re looking for power... Cdt 15a CD player, S301 bluray, i too really enjoy my Parasound amps Parasound a plug, pics... To go ; s take a look at your preamp before the amp, especially because living. Measured 218.4 watts per channel 525 connected via XLR to the mix all... As much information i can get before making a decision and sell me the Parasound does get! Between all channels mates, what i am saying is, there something!

Starburst Gelatin Type, Articles A