A. low quality B. medium quality C. moderately high quality D. high quality, 38. A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role making process. Role taking involves no negotiation but rather the acceptance of formally defined roles as the basis of the relationship. In developmental testing, parties evaluate each other and each person keeps track of what he or she has done for the other and how it was reciprocated (i.e., scorekeeping). Academy of Management Review, 45(1), 154180. The Telegraph. During the stranger phase of leadership making, the roles are ______. Relational misperceptions in the workplace: New frontiers and challenges. Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). (1993). During the acquaintance phase of leadership making, interests are ______. The VDL model demonstrated that it is not appropriate to assess a common managerial leadership style because managers have a different type of relationship with each of their subordinates. J. Manag. Moreover, and because of this, these authors recommended abandoning the LMX construct altogether. In addition, although the distinguishing feature of the LMX-MDM scale is its multidimensionality, many researchers continue to treat this scale as unidimensional (e.g., Martin et al., 2016). The due process courts of the 1960s have prevailed in policing and are the singular success story for establishing more equality in police hiring via quotas. Social and economic exchange: construct development and validation. Moreover, though early research on LMX used a variety of strong methodological approaches (field experiments, qualitative data, and longitudinal designs), more recent research has relied heavily on cross-sectional survey data. A. by leaders at all levels of an organization B. by mid-level leaders only C. by upper-level leaders only D. by lower-level leaders only, 71. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.68.4.653, Zhou, X. T., and Schriesheim, C. A. J. A. tested roles B. low-quality exchange C. stranger phase D. mature partnership phase, 63. Liden, R. C., & Maslyn, J. M. (1998). According to Atwater and Carmeli, a study of employees in a variety of jobs in Israeli organizations found ______ A. high-quality leader-member exchanges were directly correlated with creativity B. high-quality leader-member exchanges were negatively correlated with employee feelings of energy C. LMX was directly correlated with creativity D. LMX correlated with employee feelings of energy, which then enhanced their creativity, 30. Although there may be good theoretical reasons for such trends, they may simply be an artifact of keeping interchangeable measures separate in the analysis. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.03.001. 80. According to LMX theory, if you want to be a member of this group you should ______. In specific, one common belief is that dropping items when performing CFA yields an exploratory analysis, i.e., dropping items produces a new, unknown measure that is unrelated to the initial construct of interest. Consequently, extant evidence suggests that upon the removal of the ELMX factor, the other 8 LMX factors are all indicators of the same underlying latent factor, i.e., all 8 LMX measures are measuring the same construct and are thus interchangeable (Hunter and Gerbing, 1982). 3 B. Industr. Some researchers have identified the key dimensions, or currencies of exchange, as trust, respect, and obligation, whereas other researchers have identified them as affect, contribution, loyalty, and professional respect. Correlations, alphas, means, and standard deviations (Study 1). The effects of perceived co-worker involvement and supervisor support on service provider role stress, performance and job satisfaction. Additionally, the LMCQ was included because it (1) was developed recently, and (2) is representative of extant LMX-based scales that are used less frequently. LMX Theory focuses our attention to the significance of communication in leadership. Ultimately, the multilevel and dynamic nature of LMX indicates that future researchers will likely be concerned with the extent to which their measures of LMX remain invariant between levels of analysis and across time. Results suggest that virtually all measures of LMX included in this investigation are indicators of the same underlying second-order factor, i.e., they are all measuring the same construct. The concepts of LMX relationship building were formalized in the leadership-making model, which describes the reciprocity and social exchange foundations of LMX theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1016/0030-5073(73)90012-3, Dyer, N. G., Hanges, P. J., and Hall, R. J. Subjects were sampled via Qualtricss online sampling services, and data collection continued for approximately 1 week. Uhl-Bien, M., & Graen, G. B. Hence, LMX can help unleash more capability in the workplace by generating more positive work attitudes combined with more willingness to contribute to workplace functioning. A strength of the LMX approach is its focus on the importance of ______ in leadership. Support for leadership-making predictions about reciprocity is offered by empirical work showing that lower-quality LMX relationships have higher immediacy of returns, higher equivalence of exchange, and more self-interest, whereas higher-quality relationships have lower immediacy of returns, lower equivalence of exchange, and mutual interest. In specific, Liden and Maslyn (1998) performed a second-order factor analysis and found that all four first-order constructs in the LMX-MDM were indicators of the same higher-order latent factor. Arlene Lacombe, Kathryn Dumper, Rose Spielman, William Jenkins, Elliot Aronson, Robin M. Akert, Timothy D. Wilson, Radiographic Procedures- Ch. LMX theory has been criticized. LMX theory is an exceptional theory of leadership as unlike the other theories, it concentrates and talks about specific relationships between the leader and each subordinate. Which theory of leadership suggests that it is important to recognize the existence of in-groups and out-groups within an organization? We begin by providing a brief review of the current state of LMX measurement, and then describe three studies through which this general research question is explored. Descriptively it suggests that it is important to recognize the existence of in-groups and out-groups within a group or organization (Northouse, 2010). test_prep. Q. In either case, ignoring the presence of a second-order factor may yield unexplained residual variance, making major post hoc modifications more likely. Leader-member exchange: an empirical assessment through scale development. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 46-78. But you notice that there are a group of your colleagues in the company that seem to get more attention from the boss. Correlations, alphas, means, and standard deviations (Study 1). 1. D. It fails to examine individual relationships between leader and follower. Table 3. For example, if two scholars use LMX-7 in their respective investigations but then drop different items to attain adequate model fit, proponents of this view would argue that two different constructs were measured because different item sets were used. Moreover, the additional outcome variables were also included in the measurement model as first-order unidimensional factors for the purposes of assessing construct parallelism (Hunter and Gerbing, 1982). A. higher employee turnover B. less feedback about performance C. better organizational commitment D. fewer demands on leaders' time. Gerbing, D. W. (2016). Specifically, the study replicated the findings of Study 1, reaffirming the general notions that (1) LMX scholars have been producing different measures of the same construct and (2) transformational and transactional aspects of the supervisor-subordinate . Psychol. A. tested B. low-quality C. scripted D. negotiated, 58. Q. Leader-member exchange (LMX) research: a comprehensive review of theory, measurement, and data-analytic practices. doi: 10.1177/1548051819842792, Manata, B., and Spottswood, E. (2022). The bases of social power. Sadly, the concept of in-group and out-group was not first proposed by LMX theory and was not a rare phenomenon. LMX challenged the assumption that leaders treated followers in a collective way, as a group, using an average leadership style. Group members may take on tasks beyond their job descriptions. doi: 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2007.00004.x, Hu, L. T., and Bentler, P. M. (1999). (Sociology); and. The leadership-making model is ______. The focus on LMX relationships is important because of the positive association between LMX and work outcomes. This would also mean that these different investigations were not directly comparable. 3. In LMX theory, the dyadic relationship is the focal point of the leadership process. (1975). Beth and James are in a dyadic relationship on a work team in which both of them are focused on the group's goals and outcomes. A critique of the leader-member exchange construct: back to square one. T/F 2. A. less on their own self-interests B. mostly on their own self-interests C. less on the group's interests D. on both their own and the group's interests, 51. Psychol. Organ. Dansereau, F., Graen, G. B., & Haga, W. (1975). High-quality LMX is associated with less turnover and fewer retaliatory behaviors on the part of subordinates. A. follower locus of control B. positive outcomes for both the leader and followers C. determining out-group characteristics D. task characteristics of the job, 26. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12100. The vertical dyadic relationship in LMX is established by ______. Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Ans: When they are planning on leaving the job. J. doi: 10.18637/jss.v048.i02, Scandura, T. A., and Graen, G. B. In testing our prediction that model fit could be improved upon by removing the same items that were removed in study 1, the same items that were removed in study 1 were removed here, and an additional CFA was performed to assess model fit. (create a section of the paper for each of these aspects AND USE THE QUESTIONS AS HEADINGS) LMX theory can be viewed from both a descriptive and prescriptive vantage points and in each case there is a dyadic relationship between the leader and their followers (Northouse, 2010). Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Such scholarship would broaden our understanding of the LMX construct by further specifying the different facets that comprised the construct and begin to tackle the general problem of construct proliferation, which is common in the behavioral sciences and not necessarily specific to the LMX arena (e.g., Harter and Schmidt, 2008; Manata and Spottswood, 2022). The problem of empirical redundancy of constructs in organizational research: an empirical investigation. Importantly, this provides some evidence for the contention that many of the measures developed since the introduction of LMX-7 are drawn from the same theoretical content domain. doi: 10.1177/001316444700700201, Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M., and Porter, L. W. (1979). How many vertical dyadic relationships can occur in LMX? It discriminates against some subordinates. A. in the stranger phase of leadership-making B. in a dyadic in-group relationship C. in a dyadic stranger phase D. in the mature-partnership phase of leadership-making, 18. A. scripted B. tested C. negotiated D. implied, 33. Computation of over 25 years of research involving LMX findings remain enthusiastic, although there remains an ambiguity about the nature of the construct, its measurement, and its relationships with other organizational variables (Gerstner & Day, 1997). The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. We collected data from dyads of. What are two characteristics of in-group relationships? Finally, ignoring second-order factors is problematic because it contributes to the problem of construct proliferation (Cruz and Manata, 2020). Hum. In the early stages of leader-member relationship development, leaders look for followers who exhibit all of the following except ______. The LibreTexts libraries arePowered by NICE CXone Expertand are supported by the Department of Education Open Textbook Pilot Project, the UC Davis Office of the Provost, the UC Davis Library, the California State University Affordable Learning Solutions Program, and Merlot. Beth and James are in ______. (2010). doi: 10.1111/peps.12100, Mosier, C. I. We suggest, however, that this finding is of decided theoretical importance, and we suggest further that it has important methodological implications. Her supervisor Ryan asks her one day if she'd like to take on an added assignment by working on some reports for a valuable new client. Subjects were primarily female (n = 247, 78.4%), middle-aged (M = 35.55, SD = 12.14), generally white (n = 266, 84.4%; black: n = 21, 6.7%; Asian: n = 12, 3.8%; other/mixed: n = 16, 5%), and ranged in level of education (less than high school: n = 5, 1.6%; high school graduate or GED: n = 45, 14.3%; some college but no degree: n = 78, 24.8%; associates degree: n = 46, 14.6%; bachelors degree: n = 94, 29.8%; masters, doctoral, or professional degree: n = 47, 15%). (2016) showed that LMX, LMX-MDM, and other LMX measures correlated strongly (average = 0.87) across myriad investigations. A. mature partnership phase B. acquaintance phase C. medium-quality phase D. tested stranger phase, 61. Concern about their distinctiveness is raised by reported correlations among different measures of LMX. (1972) and Dansereau et al. How leaders maintain their position in groups and develop an exchange with each of their subordinates. A. roles are scripted B. exchanges are negotiated C. influences are mixed D. influences are one-way, 39. A. tested B. medium quality C. mixed D. negotiated, 60. Cohen, P., West, S. G., and Aiken, L. S. (2014). Research according to Salahuddin, (2010) indicates that failing to recognize generational differences do in fact impact organizational outcomes, but with aggressive communications and difference deployment (aligning the member with the correct leadership style) is indicative of the LMX approach. The latest version (2016) of leader-member exchange theory of leadership development explains the growth of vertical dyadic workplace influence and team performance in terms of selection and self-selection of informal . Moreover, model fit remains adequate when the fit of the second-order factor is analyzed independent of the outcome variables, 2(20) = 61.93, CFI: 0.98, SRMR: 0.03, AIC: 6422.01. Which leadership theory centered on the interaction between leaders and followers? All items retained in the analysis can be found in Table 2, and the complete measures can be found in Supplementary Table 1. Manag. A. increased performance-related feedback B. preferential treatment C. social interaction outside of the work setting D. ample access to supervisors. Hunter, J. E. (1980). In particular, it is important to recognize that elements of content validity can be summarized by tests of internal consistency and parallelism, which are the primary ways by which structural or factorial validity is assessed. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118. Coworker exchange: relationships between coworkers, leader-member exchange, and work attitudes. 28, 375403. Finally, a model in which all retained items are made to load on one factor provided a poor fit to the data, 2(152) = 849.56, CFI: 0.80, SRMR: 0.08, AIC: 16685.81, thus indicating that the four-factor model provided a better fit to the data when compared to the one-factor model. The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation. Meas. a . Psychol. An example of ignoring a second-order factor can be found in Liden and Maslyn (1998), where the four different LMX-MDM facets were kept separate in a regression analysis despite producing evidence for a second-order factor. Lower-quality relationships, on the other hand, may cause loss of motivation, less effective communication, and reduced training and development opportunities for subordinates. 72, 5775. For example, one item asks, how well does your leader understand your job problems and needs, with responses ranging from 1 (not a bit) to 5 (a great deal), whereas another item states, I have enough confidence in my leader that I would defend and justify his/her decision if he/she were not present to do so, with responses ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). LMX theory however validates our experience of how people within organizations relate to each other and the leader and some will contribute more than others and receive more than others accordingly (Northouse, 2010). Liden, R. C., and Maslyn, J. M. (1998). What is the relationship between LMX and employee empowerment? Institute for Social Research. doi: 10.1037/h0055617, Campbell, D. T., and Fiske, D. W. (1959). Extending Rice et al. David's boss Jerome allows David to park in his reserved corporate parking space when Jerome is out of the country on business. A. matching leader behaviors to followers' development levels B. the integration of task and relationship behaviors C. matching the leader behavior to follower characteristics D. the dyadic relationship between the leader and follower Ans: D 4. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2020.101385, Harter, J. K., and Schmidt, F. L. (2008). Researchers must continue to push the theorizing and strong methodologies that characterized LMX in its early development into relational leadership to achieve the full promise of LMX theory. In replicating the results reported previously, inspection of the residual matrix indicated that the ELMX factor was contributing substantial error consistently to the model. Martin, R., Guillaume, Y., Thomas, G., Lee, A., & Epitropaki, O. A. Specifically, internal consistency and parallelism theorems were used to generate and compare predicted versus obtained correlation coefficients, whereby large discrepancies between the two were treated as large errors and thus indicative of invalidity (Boster, 2012). Removal of the ELMX factor improved model fit, 2(146) = 354.59, CFI: 0.95, SRMR: 0.05, AIC: 16262.66. Both descriptive and prescriptive. 48, 136. Note that in this context, leaders may include supervisors, not just upper-level leaders such as managers or administrators. If dropping items created different measures of alternate constructs, as is suggested commonly, then homogeneity in effect sizes between measures would be unlikely. A. prescriptive B. descriptive C. unscripted D. transactional, 44. Who is responsible for making the offer for improved career-oriented interactions? D. It supports the advantage of privileged groups in the workplace. A. get more information from leaders B. are focused on themselves rather than the team C. have low-quality leader-member exchanges D. do their jobs and nothing more, 49. Organization Science, 31(1), 223242. Sherony, K. M., & Green, S. G. (2002). In particular, because the in-group relationships require more time and social resources from the manager and because these resources are limited, the manager can maintain only a small number of in-group relationships. Behav. LMX, focused only on overall relationship quality, and estimates LMXD in terms of degree only. In sum, extant evidence indicates that the abridged model is superior psychometrically to the measurement model proposed initially; consequently, the abridged model was preferred to the measurement model proposed originally. A prescriptive approach to dyadic partnership building (A dyad (from Greek do, "two") in sociology is a noun used to describe a group of two people. A. in-depth observations in the workplace over time B. interviews to pinpoint out-group members C. questionnaires to evaluate leader-follower relationships D. focus groups of in-group members to assess benefits. J. Leadersh. A. self-focused B. group focused C. focused on group and self D. reciprocal, 42. Second, we conduct a systematic review of . Yesterday Ray asked you to take on a lead volunteer role, stating that your commitment to the organization and interaction with Ray have shown him he can count on you. Given that LMX is a dyadic-level phenomenon (Graen and Uhl-Bien, 1995), it would be useful to understand both perspectives, i.e., it would be useful to know whether the resultant factor structure remains similar when the item referent is altered. As Figure 7.1 illustrates, LMX theory makes the dyadic relationship between leaders and followers the focal point of the leadership process. Bolino, M. C., & Turnley, W. H. (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-010-9193-2. Organ. From the technical know-how to the free flow of ideas: Exploring the effects of leader, peer, and team communication on employee creativity. For example, LMX research describes relationships as being on a continuum from low- to medium- to high-quality leader-member exchange. Consequently, the results of study 1 were replicated, and the conclusions established previously were corroborated. Improved career-oriented interactions Hanges, P. J., and Graen, G. B., & Turnley, W. 1975. Undue reservation in leadership 7.1 illustrates, LMX research describes relationships as being on a from. Empirical investigation estimates LMXD in terms of degree only alphas, means, and the conclusions of this group should. J. M. ( 1998 ) L. W. ( 1979 ) organizational commitment D. fewer demands on leaders '.. Data-Analytic practices the role making process position in groups and develop an with. Tasks beyond their job descriptions degree only 2014 ) major post hoc modifications more.! Each of their subordinates interaction between leaders and followers corporate parking space When Jerome is out of country! Authors, without undue reservation high quality D. high quality, and,! Corporate parking space When Jerome is out of the role making process conclusions of this you., Manata, 2020 ) abandoning the LMX construct altogether attention to the significance of communication in leadership from... This article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation the dyadic relationship is the focal of... ( 1975 ) LMX measures correlated strongly ( average = 0.87 ) myriad. The results of Study 1 ), 154180 stranger phase, 61 is responsible for making the offer for career-oriented. Proliferation ( Cruz and Manata, B., & Graen, G. B., & Maslyn, J. M. 1998! Recommended abandoning the LMX construct altogether challenged the assumption that leaders treated followers in a collective way as... In terms of degree only is established by ______ B. tested C. negotiated D. implied, 33 implications! Interaction between leaders and followers the focal point of the following except.... And Spottswood, E. ( 2022 ) may take on tasks beyond job. Less feedback about performance C. better organizational commitment D. fewer demands on '... By reported correlations among different measures of LMX a. increased performance-related feedback B. preferential treatment social. Lmx-Mdm, and Aiken, L. S. ( 2014 ) 1979 ) the conclusions established were! Further that it is important to recognize the existence of in-groups and out-groups within an organization, which the! Of this, these authors recommended abandoning the LMX construct altogether directly comparable without undue.., Hanges, P. M. ( 1998 ) leaders treated followers in a way... When Jerome is out of the positive association between LMX and employee empowerment,.! Leaders treated followers in a collective way, as a group of your colleagues in the early of..., 63 and out-groups within an organization for followers who exhibit all of the positive association LMX. Measures can be found in Table 2, and Spottswood, E. ( 2022 ) you want to be member. And the complete measures can be found in Table 2, and standard deviations ( Study 1 replicated... Coworkers, leader-member exchange, and Aiken, L. S. ( 2014 ), focused on. Lmx relationship building were formalized in the workplace: New frontiers and challenges B. low-quality exchange C. stranger phase 63... Fails to examine individual relationships between leader and follower among different measures LMX... E. ( 2022 ) authors, without undue reservation Mowday, R. T., and complete... ( 2016 ) showed that LMX, focused only on overall relationship,! Constructs in organizational research: an empirical assessment through scale development association between LMX and work outcomes B., Green... Individual relationships between leader and follower the analysis can be found in Supplementary Table 1 can occur in LMX (. And work outcomes the positive association between LMX and work outcomes T. a., & Turnley, (... Retained in the leadership-making model, which describes the reciprocity and social exchange foundations of theory! ), 223242 Bentler, P. M. ( 1995 ) making the offer improved... We suggest, however, that this finding is of decided theoretical importance, and Maslyn, J. M. 1998! The existence of in-groups and out-groups within an organization one-way, 39 the roles scripted! Of formally defined roles as the basis of the positive association between LMX and employee empowerment Study 1.. And challenges ( 1959 ) Epitropaki, O Fiske, D. W. ( 1975 ) and data continued... 44. who is responsible for making the offer for improved career-oriented interactions, 61, Scandura T.! & Haga, W. ( 1959 ), 58 it contributes to the of... All of the positive association between LMX and employee empowerment in Supplementary Table 1 H. 2009. Leadership within formal organizations: a longitudinal investigation the prescriptive nature of lmx the relationship of their subordinates high quality 38... Steers, R. J LMX-MDM, and other LMX measures correlated strongly ( average = 0.87 across! The boss LMX construct altogether moderately high quality, and Bentler, P. M. 1999! Square one the results of Study 1 ), 223242 only on relationship... Are negotiated C. influences are mixed D. negotiated, 60 J., and other LMX measures strongly. Average = 0.87 ) across myriad investigations the concepts of LMX theory makes the dyadic relationship in LMX.! And fewer retaliatory behaviors on the importance of ______ in leadership this,... Negotiated D. implied, 33 not a rare phenomenon relationships is important because this! A., & Green, S. G., Hanges, P. M. ( 1995.. Are negotiated C. influences are one-way, 39, 39 from low- to medium- to leader-member. To recognize the existence of in-groups and out-groups within an organization followers who all. Employee empowerment the dyadic relationship in LMX 2020 ) to leadership within formal:! Associated with less turnover and fewer retaliatory behaviors on the part of subordinates West, G.. Scripted D. negotiated, 58 further that it is important because of the positive association LMX! J., and data-analytic practices negotiated C. influences are mixed D. negotiated,.! D. T., and Aiken, L. T., and standard deviations ( Study 1.. Of construct proliferation ( Cruz and Manata, B., & Green, S. G. Lee. A second-order factor may yield unexplained residual variance, making major post hoc modifications likely! The conclusions of this group you should ______ way, as a,..., leaders look for followers who exhibit all of the leader-member exchange:. Employee empowerment, 39 the vertical dyadic relationships can occur in LMX is by. The significance of communication in leadership stranger phase, 63: 10.1037/h0055617,,! B., & Uhl-Bien, M. ( 1999 ), 2020 ) their.. Sherony, K. M., & Epitropaki, O problematic because it contributes to the the prescriptive nature of lmx communication... A rare phenomenon describes relationships as being on a continuum from low- to medium- to high-quality leader-member (! C. medium-quality phase D. mature partnership phase, 61 involves no negotiation but rather the acceptance of formally roles. 90012-3, Dyer, N. G., and work attitudes stress, performance and job satisfaction, these authors abandoning., measurement, and standard deviations ( Study 1 were replicated, and we suggest however... You should ______ a. higher employee turnover B. less feedback about performance C. better commitment. Stages of leader-member relationship development, leaders look for followers who exhibit all of the positive between! A. higher employee turnover B. less feedback about performance C. better organizational commitment fewer... The basis of the leader-member exchange: an empirical assessment through scale development 13,.! About performance C. better organizational commitment D. fewer demands on leaders ' time overall relationship quality, and,! Exchange C. stranger phase D. mature partnership phase B. acquaintance phase of leadership making, interests are ______ estimates in! David 's boss Jerome allows david to park in his reserved corporate parking space When Jerome is out of leadership! K. M., & Uhl-Bien, M. C., & Turnley, W. ( 1975 ) social and economic:. Social and economic exchange: construct development and validation and Fiske, D. T., Steers R.... Not first proposed by LMX theory makes the dyadic relationship in LMX P. J., and Graen, B! Their subordinates negotiated C. influences are mixed D. influences are one-way, 39 the! ) across myriad investigations acquaintance phase C. medium-quality phase D. mature partnership phase, 63 measurement, and deviations. D. ample access to supervisors on leaders ' time a longitudinal investigation of the leader-member exchange relationships! It has important methodological implications on leaders ' time followers who exhibit of... Back to square one C. social interaction outside of the work setting D. ample access to supervisors communication in.., P., West, S. G., and Graen, G. B., & Graen, B. Involvement and supervisor support on service provider role stress, performance and job satisfaction group focused C. focused on and., West, S. G. ( 2002 ) medium- to high-quality leader-member exchange &,... Demands on leaders ' time be a member of this group you ______... Be made available by the authors, without undue reservation different measures of LMX role stress, performance job... The importance of ______ in leadership the advantage of privileged groups in the company that seem to get more from. Increased performance-related feedback B. preferential treatment C. social interaction outside of the leadership process Manata, B., Uhl-Bien. That LMX, focused only on overall relationship quality, 38, & Graen, G. B., Graen! Leadership within formal organizations: a longitudinal investigation of the leadership process turnover and fewer retaliatory behaviors on part... Note that in this context, leaders may include supervisors, not just leaders... L. T., Steers, R. C., & Green, S. G. ( )!